Donkeys, Jesus, Don Quixote, Kant, and Other Idiots: Dostoevsky’s The Idiot and Nietzsche’s Antichrist
The essay analyzes Dostoevsky’s concept of idiocy and his interpretation of Christ as compared to Nietzsche and Cervantes. Dostoevsky is not so much interested in the historical Jesus as in the psychological type of Jesus, a topic that would later interest Nietzsche. For both Dostoevsky and Nietzsche, if Jesus is only human, he must be an “idiot” of sorts. For Dostoevsky, “idiocy” is associated with the theological tradition of docta ignorantia. I further consider how Nietzsche, who, like Dostoevsky, draws on the original meaning of the word “idiot” in his discussion of Jesus, can offer a useful and insightful interpretation of Dostoevsky’s concept of “idiocy” as depicted in his novel. In tracing the connection between Jesus, Don Quixote, and Kant in Nietzsche’s notion of “idiot”, I consider how Nietzsche’s reading of Dostoevsky can help us better understand Dostoevsky’s “perfectly beautiful man”, as Nietzsche’s interpretation of Jesus seems a fairly accurate description of Prince Myshkin. Their respective attitudes toward Don Quixote provide an important additional dimension to their interpretations of the human type of Jesus as an idiot. Although neither Dostoevsky nor Nietzsche explicitly called Cervantes’ foolish knight an idiot, their respective interpretations of Jesus’ “idiocy” are contaminated by their views of Don Quixote. Both viewed him as a kind of failed Jesus figure, and both lamented Cervantes’ satirical portrayal of his lofty “anti-realist”, though perhaps for slightly different reasons. The essay concluded by comparing Dostoevsky’s and Nietzsche’s notions of realism. Both Dostoevsky and Nietzsche were driven by a desperate search for truth and considered themselves realists, though each put a different meaning into a concept. Both Dostoevsky and Nietzsche were fascinated by the figure of Jesus the man and his underlying mental dispositions, and they depicted him equally as a kind of “idiot”. The tragic “yes” of Dostoevsky and the tragic “no” of Nietzsche clashed in their interpretation of the “positively beautiful man” and the question of faith. Both sought to say “yes” to reality, as different as this reality may have been understood by the two thinkers.
donkey/ass, philosophy, Nicholas of Cusa, Apuleius, The Golden Ass, Nietzsche, Kant, Cervantes, Christ, Jesus, Don Quixote, Holbein, Renan, idiocy, idiot, “learned ignorance”, docta ignorantia, ratio, intellectus, anti-Christ, heroism, reality, realism.
Authors must attend to the following conditions:
- Authors will retain copyright of their work but give the journal first publishing rights. Articles will be simultaneously licensed by a Creative Common License - Attribution - No Commercial Use that permits other researchers to share the work by indicating the author’s intellectual property and its first publishing in this journal not for commercial use.
- Authors can adhere to other license agreements not exclusive to the distribution of the published version of their work (for example: include it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph) as long as they indicate that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors can disseminate their work (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal website) before and during the submission procedure, as it can lead to advantageous exchanges and citations of the work (see also, The Effect of Open Access).
If you have questions, you may contact: